Biocontrol Trial Given Go-Ahead

A trial release of a tiny Japanese insect has been sanctioned by DEFRA to try to control the spread of Japanese Knotweed, a rapidly growing introduced plant that reportedly costs over £150 million per year to control.

In its native Japan the plant does not rage out of control as it does here, suggesting that there must be biological controls in place in the local ecosystem. CABI, a not-for-profit organisation that uses scientific expertise to solve agricultural and environmental problems, investigated nearly 240 of the target species’ natural predators in order to find one that would feed on Japanese Knotweed and nothing else.

The best control agent was found to be Aphalara itadori, a psyllid that stunts the growth of the plant by feeding on its sap. The tiny insect only fed on the target plant during the experiments, even leaving very close relatives of Knotweed alone. In theory, the rest of the British ecosystem should be left alone by the insect, but contingency plans are in place to in case of any unforeseen circumstances.

My belief is that in order for the weed to be truly controlled, one predator will not be enough. If it takes 240 species to control it in Japan, why will one insect do the job here?

The trial release will take place in a handful of isolated sites, with further releases planned for the future if phase one is successful. It is the first instance of biological control, the use of a natural predator to control an invasive species, being attempted in the EU so it is unclear how it will pan out, but if you ask me I do not think this will work, but we will have to wait a few years to see the full results.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://layscience.net/trackback/970
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Wigarse (not verified) on Tue, 03/09/2010 - 23:59

One predator is better than none and we must tread very carefully lest we unleash something worse. I'm all for trying this one out first and seeing how it goes. We don't need to eradicate knotweed, just get it under control; one may be enough to do that.

davidp (not verified) on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 00:30

Prickly pear in Australia was succesfully controlled by the introduction of a single moth species in 1925 (Cactoblastis cactorum according to Wikipedia). Controlled - no massive areas of prickly pear - not eradicated, but a succesful management result.

Ben (not verified) on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 03:20

Australia used to have a problem with beetles eating sugar cane. So we imported a single species to control them in 1935. Cane Toads. That didn't work out very well, and is a continuing headache for Australia.

David on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 12:21

There has been a lot of work carried out to ensure that this insect will only act on the Knotweed, but we can never be sure of what will happen in the wild.

I agree that it is better to be doing something rather than nothing at all and I am looking forward to the results, but I am not expeecting a huge amount to come out of this.

Tessera on Thu, 03/11/2010 - 09:21

Ben - I was thinking cane toads too but maybe I'm just being cynical.

davidp (not verified) on Tue, 03/16/2010 - 08:02

There were some strong scientific protests about the cane toad release into Australia in 1935 (http://australianmuseum.net.au/Cane-Toad), but the sugar cane interests overrode them and the releases were continued. CABI seem to have put a lot more work and care into choosing a biological control that will not cause problems in the U.K.


Wikio - Top BlogsCurrent CO2 level in the atmosphere