
The Guardian published a story earlier this week about a Belfast climate scientist Prof Mike Baillie, who is disgruntled at having to make his department's decades' worth of tree ring data available to a known climate sceptic as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. This story prompted the editor of this blog to post the above tweet. Also: "I don't see the point of curating data for the public", and "any nutter can attempt to disrupt my research".
Really? Let me turn this question round: what reason could there be for the public not to have access to publicly-funded academic research? When research is funded from the public coffers, surely it's automatically relevant to public interest?
Also, don't some of our most respected colleague science bloggers frequently campaign for increased transparency in the handling of data from, say, clinical trials? Why should that call not apply to other subjects?
Let's backtrack for a moment.